Crypto tax accountant: Crypto Accountant Register

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

2 of the 15 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 13 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 0 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in members (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 9 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): One row per practice: which statutory or professional register it appears on (ICAEW, ICAS, ACCA, CIOT, ATT, AAT in the UK; the IRS credentialed-preparer directory and state CPA licensure in the US), what that badge actually attests, whether the practice publicly claims crypto work, and whether it names a fee.

The derivation is the JOIN and the gap it exposes: the count of practices that both hold a regulated credential AND advertise crypto, per region - which is far smaller than either list alone, and is the only honest answer to 'crypto accountant near me'.

Beside it, what each credential permits, since 'chartered', 'chartered tax adviser', 'licensed', 'enrolled agent' and 'CPA' are five different things a buyer reads as one, and anyone at all may call themselves an accountant in the UK.

9 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.