Crypto tax app: Crypto Tax Software Index

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

7 of the 29 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 22 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 2 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 156 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): One row per vendor: the published price at each transaction tier, the jurisdictions it produces a report for, the cost-basis methods it supports, the exchange and chain integrations it claims, and whether it has a free tier.

The derivations are three the vendors will not publish about each other: the price of the SAME transaction count across every vendor on the same day - which is the comparison a buyer needs and which the entry price hides, since a 49-dollar headline says nothing about 10,000 transactions - the count of vendors that produce a report for each jurisdiction, so a UK or Irish holder can see how thin their field really is, and the join back to the cost-basis table: which vendors offer a method that the buyer's own jurisdiction actually permits, since offering HIFO to a UK user is a feature they may not lawfully use.

156 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.